ARU Offtake Agreements

John

Administrator
Staff member
As of March 2025, Arafura has secured multiple offtake agreements to supply Neodymium-Praseodymium (NdPr) oxide from the Nolans Project:

1744753938485.png

  • Traxys Europe SA: I think this is a great move by ARU management. I was always concerned that one of our customer cornerstone investors (likely to be Posco) would have too much control over us, and ARU would become beholden to them. But having someone like Traxys, positions us well for Phase 2 off take discussions/negotiations. They were involved in the attempted resurrection of MP Materials around 2010 (from memory). It will be interesting to see if Traxys becomes a middle man between ARU and its customers, or if those customers come direct in the future. Something to keep an eye on.
  • Hyundai and Kia: Arafura has established agreements with South Korean automotive manufacturers Hyundai and Kia, further diversifying its customer base and securing demand for its NdPr oxide production. There has been some suggestion that due to the delays, the expiry dates make these non-binding. However, ARU has never said this, and it all its tables for off take, have this as binding. These two EV makers are working with Posco to build supply chains outside of china, and also setting up in USA (and other parts of the world). 10 years ago, these manufacturers had terrible cheap cars. And today, they are great. And they will provide an alterative to the Chinese EVs flooding the world.
  • Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy: An offtake agreement has been signed with Siemens Gamesa to supply NdPr rare earths, highlighting Arafura's role in supporting the renewable energy sector. Even with the ups and downs of renewable energy, these guys sign long term contracts, and need to lock in supply.
So who else is a likely off take customer of ARU for Phase 1:

  • Posco – The Korean steel maker with BIG BIG plans to change supply chains. I personally think, that with all the demand they will see for their magnets, they will need to secure multiple rare earth mine off take from around the world. This also diversifies their supply risk. So I def see them locking in off take with ARU. Also, they have history with investing in Gina’s mines - Gwangyang Lithium Project (through Pilbara Minerals). They have also raise a load of money through bond issues to develop/invest in their strategy. So ARU would only be a small part of this investment.
  • USA Dept of Defence – This has always been rumored, but never denied by ARU management. I would imagine that any time of negotiation would require secrecy. But in 2027, all USA military equipment, must be free from China supply. That goes right down to the minerals. Given the time for rare earth mines to come on line into production (15 years plus), where will the USA DoD and it’s contractors, source all this ex-China NdPr. MP won’t be able to do it. Lynas won’t be able to do it. They will need to secure some from each (diversify their ex-China supply). I bet they are stockpiling at the moment. (Aside – remember for the Blackbird, during the cold war, USA managed to get all the Titanium they needed from Russia, through a vast array of fake/real businesses. They should make a movie about it).
  • GE – So GE were all set to sign up for binding off take. Then, they decided to split the company into three parts. So all long term contracts etc, were not the priority. Also GE had loads of different types of wind turbines, and some with massive reliability issues that cost them dearly. But they have also restructured their product line (streamlined)…..are they now ready to sign an off take? If they don’t sign for Phase 1 I think they will def be a part of Phase 2. These guys are very much focused on ESG….and where else will they source that?

Who else is out there that might want to be an ARU customer for off take?


And who are likely to be customers for our 20% of product (880 t/pa) on the spot market?
 
Arafura has made impressive progress securing cornerstone customers, but the full commercial and geopolitical implications of those agreements remain under-examined. The market should demand greater clarity on contract terms, hidden counterparties, and U.S. alignment, especially if ARU wants to become a reliable non-Chinese NdPr hub. Whether the Nolans Project becomes a strategic pillar of Western supply chains—or just another mid-tier producer—will hinge on these answers.
 

Potential Off-take Partners – Arafura Rare Earths​


Since the off takes are so pivotal I thought it would be worth exploring some potential partners.
As you may know, Arafura’s Nolans project plans to produce ~4,440 tpa of NdPr. With roughly two-thirds already contracted, about one-third (~34%) of output remains unallocated (≈1,500–1,625 tpa).

So to achieve FID ARU has indicated the remaining piece are partners in Asia and Europe include, the could be the following:

  • Nidec Corporation (Motors, Japan): Leading global motor maker for EVs, industrial drives and defense systems, heavily reliant on NdFeB magnets. Nidec has just signed a 5-year magnet supply agreement in the US to strengthen its supply chain, emphasising resilience and “sustainability”. Its focus on supply‑chain security suggests it would consider non‑Chinese NdPr sources.

    Likelihood: High.

  • Sumitomo Corporation (Trading/Commodities, Japan): Major trading house. In early 2023 Sumitomo agreed to be the exclusive distributor of NdPr oxide from US miner MP Materials into Japan, explicitly to “diversify and strengthen” Japan’s supply. This shows Sumitomo is committed to sourcing NdPr from allied producers. It is likely to welcome additional NdPr off-takes (e.g. from Arafura) to meet Japanese EV and electronics demand.

    Likelihood: Med to High.

  • POSCO International (Metals/Trading, S. Korea): Trading arm of Korea’s POSCO Group. In 2025 POSCO Int. signed an MOU with US partner Energy Fuels to build a “non-China” NdPr-to-magnet supply chain for EVs. POSCO Int. will process NdPr into magnets for automakers worldwide (US, Europe, Korea, Japan)inspenet.com. This clear strategy of diversifying away from Chinese supply makes it a strong candidate to off-take Australian NdPr as well.

    Likelihood: High.

  • Toyota Motor Corporation (Automotive, Japan): Japan’s largest automaker, maker of hybrids and EVs. Toyota traditionally uses NdFeB magnets in many traction motors but has recently announced a ~20% cut in heavy rare‑earth content in its magnets. This R&D focus on reduced Nd content highlights Toyota’s concern over rare‑earth supply, even as it still relies on NdPr for high-performance motors. Toyota’s global magnet needs and ESG commitments could lead it to secure additional non-Chinese NdPr sources – though it is also innovating to use less.

    Likelihood: Low.

On the European side, potentially the following companies


  • Stellantis N.V. (Automotive, Netherlands/France): EU auto group (Peugeot, Fiat, Opel, Chrysler, etc.) ramping up EVs. Stellantis explicitly aims for “resilient supply chains” for critical materials. In mid-2023 it signed a 10-year NdPr off-take term sheet with U.S. miner NioCorp to secure rare-earth oxides for EV magnets and even considered investing in the minestellantis.com. This proactive rare-earth strategy suggests Stellantis will seek multiple NdPr suppliers.

    Likelihood: Low.

  • BMW Group (Automotive, Germany): Premium carmaker, major EV producer using NdFeB motors. BMW is subject to the EU’s Critical Raw Materials Act, which in 2023 forced European automakers like BMW (and Renault) to audit and certify sustainable rare-earth supply chains. With Chinese export restrictions in place, BMW is under pressure to diversify. I infer BMW will be keen on “Tier-1” NdPr sources (like Nolans).

    Likelihood: Medium–High.

  • Renault (Automotive, France): Large EV maker in the EU. Like BMW, Renault’s supply chains are now being tightened by EU sustainability rules. Renault depends on NdFeB magnets for its electric drivetrains and has publicly highlighted the need to secure critical minerals. Its group-level carbon and ESG goals also point to seeking additional Western rare-earth sources.

    Likelihood: Low to Medium.

  • Vestas Wind Systems A/S (Wind Energy, Denmark): Leading wind turbine OEM. Vestas uses NdFeB magnets in its turbines (in tower pitch drives and older permanent‑magnet generators). The company has a strong sustainability focus (recent turbine designs eliminate heavy rare-earth use) and operates in Europe under pressure to secure green supply chains. Vestas likely prefers suppliers with ESG credentials and is a logical customer for Australian NdPr.

    Likelihood: Low.

There is also Volkswagen in EU, and Ford in the USA, but Ford would probably go with MP.

Is there anyone else that could be an off-take partner? I rated some on High only due to being able to include an investment in their off-take agreement to lock in the capital needed for ARU to kick off.
 
Back
Top