Brazil adds Colossus rare earth project to climate investment platform, connecting Viridis Mining to $25.4B capital pool for critical minerals. (read full article...)
These AI articles on Viridis are negatively biased especially towards Brazil whereas the articles on Aclara gloss over these same country issues and are all positive. Why is that?
Your article also says: Key unknowns include:
metallurgical recovery performance
processing and separation strategy
capital expenditure requirements
operating costs and margins
permitting timeline and construction schedule
But these are clearly stated in the PFS, a PFS that came out before Aclara's. Again, why is there such a negative bent towards the company?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.