WideMouthFrog
Member
No conversation from me on that one. That was my original thought when they decided the JV. Get us a $400M US partner, and due to exchange, thats $600M. Thats a dream, but one could dream.This is probably not correct, and designed to spark discussion....but maybe this last cap raise (80 million)....was the last cap raise for non-holders/externals? And the JV will bring the rest, plus the current shareholders contributing.......thoughts?
Yes, they are likely to dilute - although like your thinking not critical, and some wouldnt be happy - I personally was not happy with wasted 16% dilution. i.e. In my eyes, they have to say that the raise is going to make us 16% value... As they give a few people like Gina and us retail holders low priced shares for our past support - and a few others they want on the register. And then they use the balance to get us into construction ASAP.Wow, thanks for that reply Mr Frog. I won't say I disagree that a JV would be good.
For my money partnering with Rio or Freeport would be a great idea. I see Rio has recently partnered with Hancock for the Hope Downs project and I saw an article from May about Rio looking to jump into rare earths. Was that around the time Cabuzzo started hinting at a JV?
Naive question: would they dilute us like this if they thought a JV was in the offing?
The fastest way to monetise this now, is have cash ready to get the initial steps of construction going the moment they announce FID.