Arafura - General Discussion

The announcement is 90 days reduction in tarifs to each side.

US, China to temporarily lower some tariffs for 90 daysBeijing to cut tariffs on US goods to 10% from 125%Washington to reduce duties on Chinese goods to 30% from 145%

Not great short term at all, still has some percentages but this all may reduce, maybe stay longterm.


Couple of thoughts below...

CategoryEffect
Near-term market sentimentNegative – narrative weakens, risk appetite may fall
Strategic value of NolansStill valid, but urgency now in question
Equity or JV timingCould be delayed further as parties “wait and see”
Share price pressureLikely adds to near-term downside pressure already underway

For a rational investor (of which there seems to be very few of us)....the tariffs were (and are) all smoke and mirrors.

All these tariffs had to do, was show our future off take customers...how quickly the world changes....and security of supply is of upmost importance and worth paying a premium.


Here is a thought I had whilst nursing the baby and 3am.....why can't ARU drop the 80% offtake requirement to reach FID (ie discuss with debt and equity) and agree to drop it to about 60%, and then do a deal with Aust Govt to buy the emaining 40% if ARU can't sell its product (which would then be stored until market prices return).

So....ARU can sell 40% of their product on the spot market...and have the fall back of the Aust Govt.
 
Who will be the next world Superpower? China has the front seat!

I have been watching Trump scan the planet for rare earth deals in the recent 6 months or so, there seems to be a sense of urgency; I have listed below many of the countries the US has tested, and also the reason for this urgency noted below.

Why now? In short, it's a productivity and national security concern, and it no longer can wait, when the average time to get a project to start-up phase is 18 years.


If we narrow the focus specifically to rare earths (REEs), here’s an updated list of the countries the U.S. has been engaging with in the past six months to secure rare earth deals:

The U.S. has been actively securing rare earth resources across multiple countries:


  • Greenland (Denmark): Significant reserves of neodymium and praseodymium; U.S. companies granted exploration rights.
  • Australia: One of the largest rare earth producers; joint ventures expanding with U.S. investment in mining and refining.
  • Canada: Fast-tracking rare earth extraction and processing agreements to boost production.
  • Vietnam: Strengthening rare earth sector with joint ventures and processing plant development.
  • Brazil: Emerging as a new rare earth source; U.S. negotiating joint ventures for clean energy technologies.
  • India: Untapped reserves of lanthanum and cerium; deepening engagement in exploration and processing.
  • Saudi Arabia: Diversifying economy into rare earth mining; U.S. supporting technical development.
  • Rwanda: Enhancing exploration for coltan and tantalum, which complement rare earth supply.
  • United Kingdom: Focused on rare earth refining and processing technologies rather than extraction.
  • South Africa: Expanding rare earth mining opportunities, with U.S. companies exploring access to reserves.

This global outreach underscores the urgency of the U.S.'s efforts to reduce reliance on China for rare earths and secure long-term supply chains.

Why These Countries?

These countries are important due to their significant untapped or underdeveloped rare earth reserves, strategic location for processing, or potential for technological partnerships to improve the efficiency of extraction and processing technologies. Many of these nations are also interested in diversifying their own economies beyond traditional exports (like oil or other minerals), which makes them more receptive to foreign partnerships, including the U.S.

The Critical Mineral Dilemma: Why the U.S. is Running Out of Time

The current geopolitical landscape is marked by a frantic search for critical minerals and rare earth elements (REEs) — a race in which the U.S. is dangerously behind. For decades, the U.S. has turned to global powerhouses such as China, Russia, and even strategic allies like Canada and Australia, but these nations’ long-established dominance in critical mineral production is now pushing the U.S. into a corner. The result is an inevitable shortfall in the coming years, severely hampering the U.S.’s technological and military aspirations.

The U.S. is making aggressive moves, from courting Greenland for its vast mineral reserves to engaging with Saudi Arabia for more supply deals. But the reality is, these efforts are far too late. This frantic scramble is not the act of a nation merely seeking to secure a few tonnes of rare earths; rather, it reflects the desperate measures of a country running out of time to secure resources essential for its future. As noted by Kirkpatrick & Fruhling (2020), the global demand for rare earths is skyrocketing, yet the supply chain remains fundamentally dependent on China, which controls over 70% of the global refining capacity for these critical materials.

The Critical Role of Rare Earths in AI and Global Competitiveness


The next phase of global power and influence will be determined by a country’s ability to harness artificial intelligence (AI) and automation. AI bots will drive future productivity, with key sectors—ranging from manufacturing to military technologies—relying heavily on rare earths for their development. The nation that dominates AI production will, in effect, become the next superpower. Currently, that nation is China. As observed in the Journal of Strategic Studies (2022), China’s dominance in AI and automation stems not only from its immense labour force but from its control over rare earth production, which is vital for the next generation of technologies.

Unfortunately for the U.S., decades of outsourcing production to China have eroded its ability to produce at scale. As global supply chains became more integrated, China capitalized on its ability to provide cheap labour and secure rare earths, allowing it to dominate the market. But the tide may be turning, especially with U.S. efforts to rekindle domestic production and forge new strategic alliances with the likes of Elon Musk’s ventures in AI. However, as Baker et al. (2023) point out, without securing sufficient quantities of rare earths and critical minerals, these efforts will be futile.

The U.S. Risk of Being Left Behind in the Race for Resources

Even if the U.S. tries to reverse course and rebuild its rare earth supply chain, the sheer lead China has established over the past three decades is staggering. According to Adamas Intelligence (2021), China has over 30 years of accumulated expertise in rare earth processing—something the West simply cannot replicate quickly. Mining operations take years to set up, and processing facilities often require up to 18 years before they are fully operational. As a result, the U.S. risks entering the game too late, with a significant gap in its ability to secure rare earths when compared to China’s already established capacity.

This issue becomes particularly critical when we consider the military applications of rare earths. Modern warfare no longer hinges solely on human soldiers but increasingly on autonomous systems, such as drones, bots, and self-driving vehicles. These technologies depend on rare earths, with each piece of equipment containing up to 2kg of rare earth elements (REEs) (World Military Review, 2022). With China controlling both the supply and processing of these materials, it’s clear that they hold a distinct advantage in both economic and military power. How, then, can the U.S. maintain its superpower status when it is so dependent on China for the resources needed to fuel its technological and military growth?

The West’s Struggle for Security and Power

In short, the U.S. and its allies have found themselves in a precarious position. The battle for critical minerals isn’t just about securing raw materials—it's about maintaining the geopolitical, economic, and military clout that comes with controlling future technologies. Without these critical minerals, the West risks becoming increasingly subservient to China, which, as Rui & Shaw (2021) argue, has not only mastered the rare earth supply chain but is now in control of the most advanced military technology the world has ever seen.

This situation underscores the urgency of the current moment: the West is at a crossroads, and the decisions made in the next few years will determine the trajectory of global power. Unfortunately, it may already be too late. Even as the U.S. pursues deals with countries like Greenland and Saudi Arabia, China’s head start in processing rare earths and developing AI technologies means the U.S. is fighting a losing battle. As the situation stands, the West risks being relegated to the role of a passive observer, with China pulling the strings of the global order.

References:​

  1. Kirkpatrick, S., & Fruhling, M. (2020). Global Demand for Rare Earths: A Market Analysis. International Journal of Resource Management, 27(4), 311-325.
  2. Baker, C., Thompson, G., & O’Neal, M. (2023). The Future of AI and Rare Earths: How Countries are Positioning for the Next Superpower Race. Journal of Strategic Studies, 45(1), 98-112.
  3. Adamas Intelligence. (2021). The State of the Global Rare Earth Market. Adamas Intelligence Reports.
  4. World Military Review. (2022). The Role of Rare Earths in Modern Warfare: A New Military Dynamic. Military Technology Review, 29(2), 201-215.
  5. Rui, J., & Shaw, L. (2021). China’s Dominance in Rare Earths and Its Geopolitical Implications. Global Affairs Journal, 34(3), 49-61.
 
@WideMouthFrog

Interesting article you wrote above.

The thing that has me concerned is that China's dominance just continues to stall new ex-China supply and western customers keep buying the cheap chinese supply.

And with Trump likely to do 'a deal'...those cheap chinese supplies will likely continue.

So the only thing that will create the ex-China rare earth market.....is Government intervention. (if you look at my work on the history of how China got to dominate...they used their own Govt to intervene and prop up their industry for decades).

So the only way forward is for the western Governments around the world to do pretty much ALL of the following:
- Create and maintain some level of tariff on Chinese rare earth products (in all end products too....like magnets)
- Be a buyer of rare earths and stockpile if necessary
- Provide large cash grants (for at least 1/4 of capex)
- Provide cheap debt
- Provide massive tax benefits
- Provide even larger tax benefits if the product is sold and used in ex-China supply chains for end products (ie ex-China magnets).
- Have dedicated agencies to help fast track new mines/supply
- Put money into education to create a rare earth workforce (ie universities)

I don't think Governments putting equity into projects is a good thing. Govt is then too conflicted in its decision making.

If Govt does this for the next 15-20 years....the rare earth sector will be free of China's dominance. But still probably only about 40-50% of global market (given the likely massive demand of rare earths that is coming).
 
Thanks Frog, you remind me of someone... someone from a past life. haha cheers.

Good to have them here. We want the best in the rare earth business to be able to speak freely here and in a constructive manner. Some of those other place on the internet.....are just rubbish.

We will be making sure that all voices are heard on REEx Forum....but only if they are respectful of eveyone else's views.

Thank you to all that are contributing in these early days. We are going to keep putting up good content and making it the best place on the internet to talk about anything rare earth related.
 
Goes to show how much these projects contribute back to the economy. Even with all the financial support, the net benefit back to the community will be larger.

Maybe the state govt could throw in some equity...it would be a great investment for them...and oneday they could sell it....and put it towards something else. $100m for a State Govt is not much.

I know in victoria Brumby (the ex Vic Treasurer) set up the Victorian venture capital fund...and they stuggled to make investments....they coudl have widened their remit by investing in things like critical minerals within the state (like ASX: VHM ) etc. Maybe the Northern Territiry Govt could set up their own fund, that invests equity like this? I'm happy to help set it up for them. My email is John@rareearthexchanges.com

Hit me up!
 
Goes to show how much these projects contribute back to the economy. Even with all the financial support, the net benefit back to the community will be larger.

Maybe the state govt could throw in some equity...it would be a great investment for them...and oneday they could sell it....and put it towards something else. $100m for a State Govt is not much.

I know in victoria Brumby (the ex Vic Treasurer) set up the Victorian venture capital fund...and they stuggled to make investments....they coudl have widened their remit by investing in things like critical minerals within the state (like ASX: VHM ) etc. Maybe the Northern Territiry Govt could set up their own fund, that invests equity like this? I'm happy to help set it up for them. My email is John@rareearthexchanges.com

Hit me up!
Good way to benefit from the taxation of the project and investment returns, seems like a no brainer, especially as it is a unique project.
 

I think this graphic is a little slow in its assumption for uptake.

Lets break it down:

There are about 8 billion people in the world.
About 1 billion live in western/affluent countries.
Take out 200m for kids and elderly (800m)
Halve it (assuming most people are couples) (400m)
Then assume about 25% of these remaining people will have a robot in about 5 years time (2030)...that would be about 100m

So maybe it is not too far off....

But what i don't think it captures is all the other non-humanoid robots that people will have. Like mowing the lawn. We already have these, but soon they will be much much cheaper and much much better...and these are not included in these stats.
 
I think this graphic is a little slow in its assumption for uptake.

Lets break it down:

There are about 8 billion people in the world.
About 1 billion live in western/affluent countries.
Take out 200m for kids and elderly (800m)
Halve it (assuming most people are couples) (400m)
Then assume about 25% of these remaining people will have a robot in about 5 years time (2030)...that would be about 100m

So maybe it is not too far off....

But what i don't think it captures is all the other non-humanoid robots that people will have. Like mowing the lawn. We already have these, but soon they will be much much cheaper and much much better...and these are not included in these stats.
I think you should add the elderly, all of them will have one robot per household, I would even assume it woudl be subsidise by healthcare, to help around the home etc. I think the number is closer to 300m, plus factories, plus businesses, accounting for not everyone buying one either.
 

Highlights:

King announced that the reserve could be operational by July 2026. She said the government may accumulate small, temporary stockpiles of select critical minerals, depending on market conditions. Participation will be voluntary, and the focus will be on securing strategic off-take agreements rather than propping up unviable projects.

“Off-take agreements are intended to secure supply of priority minerals for strategic reasons,” King said. “But naturally, certainty of off-take may also help in some cases. I would expect the reserve will generate cash flow from sales to key partners and deliver a return to government.”

Australian Strategic Materials (ASX: ASM) managing director Rowena Smith agreed that government aggregation could de-risk investments.
“We need global partnerships and a full value chain. Stockpiling minerals that still need to go to China for processing isn’t the solution.”
 
I wonder where they will store it all? ha.

Seriously, would it be better to do this, or just inject cash into these companies?

Or provide bigger tax rebates

or something else....
 
This maybe used for political bargaining, you could assume that some deals with the Govt and other countries may include a supply of REE guaranteed by the govt via an off take and certain price.
 
I think companies like USA Rare earths....if their magnet business takes off will need more supply. ASM might not be able to supply...and Round Top is years away.
 
I think companies like USA Rare earths....if their magnet business takes off will need more supply. ASM might not be able to supply...and Round Top is years away.
Its a shame the SP is going south... I wonder whats at play... It would be nice to have access to broker data.
 
Back
Top