I was thinking about how Arafura will progress Nolans in two stages (Phase 1 at 4,400 tpa NdPr oxide, scaling up to 11,000 tpa in Phase 2). And that led me to think about how this ties into their broader global positioning – especially in the U.S.
There is clear demand from USA defense and wider USA industry and Washington is looking to de-risk from China.
And Gina Rinehart has been vocal about aligning Australia’s critical minerals strategy to where the long-term leverage and returns lie, often with a very pragmatic, global perspective. ie focus on USA.
So I have been thinking:
What do others think?
There is clear demand from USA defense and wider USA industry and Washington is looking to de-risk from China.
And Gina Rinehart has been vocal about aligning Australia’s critical minerals strategy to where the long-term leverage and returns lie, often with a very pragmatic, global perspective. ie focus on USA.
So I have been thinking:
- More Korea - The work that ARU managment have done with Korea has been very good. And the Koreans seem to be willing to commit and they are positioning themselves as a major ex-china supplier to USA (Star/POSCO etc.). Is there a way ARU can get more from these deals?
- Less Euro - All the European off take parties seem to be so slow and unresponsive. Yes they talk big regarding all the energy transition etc...but when it comes time to commit...things just take ages. I'm not a fan of ARU management spending much more time with Europe. They just seem like time wasters. Much like the European Union.
- Go hard for USA - I think it make sense for Arafura to build a strong U.S. customer base (DoD, automakers, magnet makers), given this is where long term higher returns are likely to be. Plus there is Trump cash about to be splashed.......
What do others think?